[BC] FAA RF rulemaking

[Mike McCarthy]

If the Part 73 station is operating with emissions in compliance, that 
should not be an issue.  But the FAA moves those things around a lot 
too...and very quietly I might add.

MM

At 10:04 AM 6/28/2006 -0400, Mark Humphrey wrote
>On 6/28/06, Mike McCarthy <Towers at mre.com> wrote:
>
>>Finally, the FAA needs to consider broadcasters using anything above 107.1
>>before they simply light up a VOR below 109.  If they took their blinders
>>off and looked where broadcasters TX's are located, they might avoid some
>>BFO issues.
>
>That would be nice, but who bears responsibility to fix the problem
>when the VOR or localizer was there first and the FM comes along later
>(or was "moved-in" from a more distant location?)
>
>The people who specialize in buying small-town stations and moving
>them to larger markets, then flipping them to big groups and pocketing
>millions apparently don't worry about these things.
>
>Mark
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
>http://www.radiolists.net/