[BC] City of Dallas & WRR

[Steve]

Getting rid of the signal interference during heat inversion season from 
Shreveport, LA is worth the trip and it will serve the audience that wants 
the format. Note, I understand what you're saying but it's not that big of a 
deal. Now there was, at one time, a deal on the table that would have been a 
bad one. This one will work for all. This is the opinion of two of us who 
what worked there and been through the battles.

Steve Newman
Steve Walker Productions
Opp, AL  36467
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Moncure" <pmoncure at radiosoft.com>
To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: [BC] City of Dallas & WRR


> Steve wrote:
>>They'll get a good signal out of it.
> It'll be good, but not as good.  My calcs show a mean of about 4 dB 
> difference, or 40 kW vs. their existing 100 kW.  This is because a 
> commercial C has rights to the full boat, 100 kW @ 600 M, while the 
> noncomm has only rights to what it may now have, which is 100 kW @ 335M, a 
> not inconsiderable difference in elevation.  And KVTT cannot easily be 
> upgraded.
>
>
> -- 
> Peter Moncure, VP RadioSoft
> 706.754.2725 -2745 FAX
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.6/378 - Release Date: 6/28/2006
>
>