[BC] to light or not to light

[Dana Puopolo]

Typical FCC CRAP!

Design it one way, then bastardize it another! Is there ANYTHING they can do
well or right?

-D



------ Original Message ------
Received: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:17:14 PM EDT
From: Cowboy <curt at spam-o-matic.net>
To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Subject: Re: [BC] to light or not to light

On Thursday 29 June 2006 09:53 pm, Sid Schweiger wrote:
> >>I thought that the landlord could accept the responsibility for
> lighting and painting the tower.<<
> 
> ...and I thought this was the whole idea behind the Antenna Structure
> Registration system - that there is one owner of record, responsible for
> keeping the structure within FCC specs.
> 
> 
> 
> Sid Schweiger

 That was the original intent, but the bureaucrats wondered, what if the
owner
 didn't ?
 So, they kept the provision that makes each and every licensee, separately
 and collectively, responsible for getting it done.
 The FCC can't cite or fine a landlord, only a licensee.

-- 
Cowboy


_______________________________________________
This is the BROADCAST mailing list
To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
http://www.radiolists.net/