[BC] TV Set/Converter
Rich Wood
richwood at pobox.com
Fri Jan 4 09:15:32 CST 2008
------ At 07:15 PM 1/2/2008, Scott Fybush wrote: -------
>Note that the converters Bruce references are NOT ones that will be
>eligible for the $40 coupon discount. That program comes with some
>very stringent (and restrictive) technical standards, courtesy of
>NTIA. In particular, boxes with HD outputs (like that Samsung) don't qualify.
I assume you mean the Samsung 451 and earlier and the H260F which are
actual tuners rather than converters. I recently replaced a 451 that
was having audio problems with one station. The H260F is
disappointing, being much less sensitive than the 451. I lost three
stations when I installed the H260F with the same antenna
configuration. I'm curious how sensitive these converters will be.
>The boxes that will meet the coupon standards aren't in stores yet,
>and my understanding is that that's deliberate - no point making
>them available before people have coupons in hand. The coupons
>distribution is supposed to start mid-February, and there are
>something like a dozen models of converter that have been approved
>for sale then. Retail price is expected to be in the $50-90 range,
>from what I hear.
The good news is a recently released study by the Consumer
Electronics Association. It claims 50% of US households already own a
digital TV. They also predict 32 million sets will be sold in 2008.
79% of those will be HDTV.
The web site is incomplete. I wonder if those with digital capability
on one set will be eligible for a converter for a second or is the
two per household limited to OTA households only.
For radio, the IBUZ folks have agreed to drop their opposition to the
XM/SIRIUS merger if IBUZ is included in new receivers. If the
estimated royalty is $40 per receiver, how can a manufacturer sell a
receiver for the current average of $49? I'm about to buy a SIRIUS
tuner for my new AV receiver for $39. At that price I'll deal with
the artifacts.
Maybe the conversion from analog TV won't be as gutwrenching as we expect.
Rich
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list