[BC] lpfm question
RichardBJohnson at comcast.net
RichardBJohnson at comcast.net
Wed Feb 18 18:38:32 CST 2009
It has always been that power is everything. Any problems you
might have with reflections because of broad beam-width are
usually secondary to the advantages of painting your power
with a broad brush so-to-speak. I would much rather use
a high power into a single-bay (designed for high power),
than a lower power into a multiple-bay antenna if energy
costs and hardware costs were not factored in.
Here is something that looks very solid.
http://www.abominablefirebug.com/NAB2008/Photos/NAB009.jpg
Here is something that doesn't.
http://www.abominablefirebug.com/NAB2008/Photos/NAB067.jpg
If cost wasn't an consideration, what would you use?
However, cost is a consideration and sometimes it is the only
viable consideration because a station needs to survive in
a particular market.
Cheers,
Richard B. Johnson
Website http://AbominableFirebug.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom" <radiofreetom at gmail.com>
As far as building penetration; many many factors - construction
methods, insulation (if any), etc. to yield a ballpark dBW figure.
Again, though, the rule of thumb (I've met Mr. Thumb, BTW... at least
his grandkid) is Tim Allen's: MORE POWER!
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list