[BC] Fairness doctrine
Glen Kippel
glen.kippel at gmail.com
Wed Feb 25 12:22:53 CST 2009
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Harold Hallikainen
<<mailto:harold at hallikainen.com>harold at hallikainen.com> wrote:
After all the recent discussion on the Fairness Doctrine, I dug up my
research notes from years ago. Here they are, with various typos. These
were prepared in the Cal Poly San Luis Obispo library where the FCC
Record, Federal Register, etc. was available.
<SNIP, etc., etc., & yada-yada>
--------------
Yikes! Not only did the licensee have to decide whether the ads were
"controversial," but what PART of the ads made them that way! I
assume that there was an opportunity for the opposition to purchase
their own ads. Does this mean that if someone pays for air time
promoting one side of a "controversial" issue, that the station would
be obligated to provide FREE air time for an opposing
viewpoint? It's no wonder that stations aired the likes of Arthur
Godfrey and Don McNeil's Breakfast Club.
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list