[BC] Franklin MW Antenna Ground Unneeded?
Richard Fry
rfry at adams.net
Mon Dec 5 08:41:02 CST 2011
For discussion...?
There is a belief that Franklin antennas do not need/use conventional,
buried radials for an r-f ground. Possibly that might related to thinking
that, as a 180/180 Franklin is fed across an insulator 1/2 way up the
structure, it must operate similar to a center-fed dipole -- and a dipole is
a balanced radiator not needing/using an r-f ground to produce its gain and
pattern.
A NEC2D study was done to compare the result of mounting a center-fed,
full-wave vertical dipole cut for 1530 kHz with the lower tip of its lower
arm 1.5 meters above a perfect earth with the same dipole in free space
(link below).
The vertical plane pattern from that dipole near the earth is not the best
as far as nighttime self-interference is concerned, and doesn't match the
pattern produced by a true Franklin.
The two sections of a Franklin are not "driven against each other" as in a
true dipole. The current and phase distribution along the two sections of a
Franklin are not the same as along the arms of a center-fed dipole of the
same overall length.
I'm thinking that in effect, the two sections of a Franklin are both
monopoles, and need to be driven against a low-loss connection to the r-f
ground plane for the same reason that a conventional, base-driven, series
fed, vertical monopole needs to be.
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h85/rfry-100/V_Dipoles_Compared.gif
RF
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list