[BC] QUESTION FOR THE "MIND" MASSES
Robert Meuser
Robertm
Fri Dec 9 23:05:55 CST 2005
Where is it written that those stations signed up for this????
R
Phil Alexander wrote:
> On 8 Dec 2005 at 9:29, WFIFeng at aol.com wrote:
>
>
>>If anything "chokes" the rollout of this flawed system on AM, it's going to
>>be the smaller stations taking the bigger ones to court, perhaps as
>>class-action, because of the destruction of their coverage areas by the intense hash that
>>this system emits.
>
>
> Yes it is bad. No question about it from the engineering viewpoint.
> However, the stations, via the NAB, are on record as willing to
> forego their coverage in "fringe" (the problem is how you define
> that) areas for the benefit (?) of starting a new service. This is
> viewed as a TEMPORARY problem that will be eliminated in the final
> full digital version. This is the point that gets overlooked.
> This is not an engineering decision. That is the part that everyone
> seems to miss.
>
> Phil Alexander, CSRE, AMD
> Broadcast Engineering Services and Technology
> (a Div. of Advanced Parts Corporation)
> Ph. (317) 335-2065 FAX (317) 335-9037
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list