[BC] extra channel naming

[khcs@juno.com]

Billl commented:

>The idea of calling the HD subchannels by numbers above 108, i.e.
108.1, etc stinks.  The listener is going to try to tune his radio up there,
then will go out to buy a new one that tunes that frequency and will get VOR
navigation signals.  Let's not confuse frequency with channel names.  Surely
there is a better way.  

------------

And I surely agree.  Maybe "95.9X2", "105.5X3" or something similar would be more appropriate.



Glen Kippel
KHCS
Palm Desert, CA