[BC] DRM

[Robert Meuser]

Based on the paper DRE presented last NAB, they have advanced the art beyond 
either DRM or IBOC. Being the newest kid on the block, this makes sense.

R



khcs at juno.com wrote:
> Willie wrote:
> 
> 
>>The FM version is certainly better on at least four different fronts...
> 
> 
> 1) Economically: You buy the box for $9,000. You own it. No license fees. 
> Ever.
> 2) Technically: The DRM signal runs in the SCA subcarrier region of your 
> existing carrier. It hooks-up just like an SCA generator(s) There is no need for 
> a 
> second transmitter, no diplexing issues, no "stomping on your 
> neighbors".
> 
> ----------
> 
> Are you sure you are not confusing DRM with DRE?  Now, I am not sure whether or not DRE uses DRM protocols on subcarriers, but DRM is being used on the main carrier, primarily on SW but some MW experimentation seems to be taking place in various countries, and IIRC it is now being considered for use on VHF.
> 
> 
> Glen Kippel
> KHCS
> Palm Desert, CA
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: http://www.radiolists.net/
>