[BC] CALLING ALL AM DAYTIMERS
Harold Hallikainen
harold
Wed Feb 22 13:34:37 CST 2006
Interesting! I wonder about listener complaints or complaints from
competition (perhaps from nearby towns). This is almost a shared time
situation.
Harold
> They told the owner of the daytimer that there was no way they could
> grant anything for him at all, but between a conversation with someone
> at the FCC and the owner of the daytimer, the guy at the commission made
> this suggestion and told the owner of the daytimer as long as there was
> no complaints from the Class A station, they would no do anything about
> it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
> [mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Harold
> Hallikainen
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 1:24 PM
> To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [BC] CALLING ALL AM DAYTIMERS
>
> What did the FCC say about this?
>
> Harold
>
>>
>>
>> Phil,
>> We had a situation here where there was no way that this particular
>> daytimer couldn't get any nighttime authorization, and no Pre-Sunrise
> or
>> Post-Sunset. It was the only station in the county, and high school
>> football was big, and nobody wanted some stupid Saturday Morning
> Replay
>> of the game, it was considered old news.
>> What the station owner of the daytimer did was contact the
> management
>> of the Class A dominate station, they both sign a letter that on
> Friday
>> Nights, (during football season) from 7:30 PM Central until 9:30
>> Central, the Class A station would accept the interference from the
>> daytimer, to allow the community to hear the football game live.
>> I know most engineers would totally disagree with this, but this was
>> the only way this could be done, and thank goodness, the Class A
> station
>> went along with it.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> For example, if high school sports is a big thing in the possible NIF
>> area or nearby, it may be worth looking into. It may also be worth
>> investigation if a nighttime license would significantly increase the
>> station's market value. Licensing in the band is no less complex than
>> maintaining a plant that *is* licensed for nighttime. <g>
>>
>>
>> Phil Alexander, CSRE, AMD
>> Broadcast Engineering Services and Technology
>> (a Div. of Advanced Parts Corporation)
>> Ph. (317) 335-2065 FAX (317) 335-9037
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.12/265 - Release Date:
> 2/20/06
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
>> http://www.radiolists.net/
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
>> http://www.radiolists.net/
>>
>
>
> --
> FCC Rules Updated Daily at http://www.hallikainen.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>
--
FCC Rules Updated Daily at http://www.hallikainen.com
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list