[BC] HD Radio Consumer Satisfaction

[Bernie Courtney]

You process till your hearts content, but to a person who's ears are
sensitive to coding artifacts it will still sound worse then analog FM.

...but its digital so it MUST be better...I must be the one missing
something :-)

bern

On 6/30/06, Kent Winrich <kwinrich at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It has EVERYTHING to do with processing!  I have heard HD stations
> that sound terrible!  I have heard HD stations that will knock your socks
> off.
>
> Sorry for the non-quote.  I tried to quote but it didnt come through.
>
>
> On 6/30/06, Bernie Courtney
> <<mailto:jerseyspikes at gmail.com>jerseyspikes at gmail.com> wrote:
> You didn't quote anything, but I assume you were talking to me, so I'll
> answer.
>
> it has nothing to do with the radio or the processing, although the answer
> to your question was a DaySequerra M4, but rather low bit rate coded
> audio.
> No matter how good you process the signal before transmission, at the end
> of
> the you you can only fit so much s--- in a 5lb bag, or 48kbps
>
> bern
> On 6/29/06, Kent Winrich <<mailto:kwinrich at gmail.com>kwinrich at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > So you have not heard properly processed HD Radio then?
> >
> > What radio are you using?
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>